Home  |  About the Book  |  Table of Contents  |  Search  |  Archive  |  Order  |  Visit JCO  |  Visit ASCO.org
ASCO Educational Book; 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar content in this book
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.

Anatomic and Functional Imaging Techniques for Response Assessment in Oncology

Daniel C. Sullivan, MD

From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

Address reprint requests to Daniel C. Sullivan, MD, Professor of Radiology; e-mail: daniel.sullivan{at}duke.edu

Overview: Combined positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) scanners are widely available now in the United States, and integration of anatomic (volumetric) data from the CT component and functional data from the PET component is likely to increasingly become the norm for monitoring tumors in both clinical practice and clinical trials. Several variations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology are also maturing for tumor monitoring. Dynamic contrast-enhance-MRI is useful in phase I or II clinical trials, but its role in routine clinical practice is unclear. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance studies to date suggest considerable promise for this modality to become important for detection and monitoring of cancer in clinical practice.